Improving Settlement Efficiency with OTC Liquidity

The global securities markets are experiencing a fundamental transformation in how trades settle, with regulators and market participants alike recognizing the critical importance of settlement efficiency. As financial markets become increasingly interconnected across jurisdictions, the focus on reducing settlement fails and improving operational performance has intensified. This article will discuss how over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity plays a vital role in addressing settlement challenges, particularly as firms prepare for shorter settlement cycles and navigate complex regulatory frameworks like the CSDR settlement discipline regime.

Key Point Summary

• Understanding Settlement Efficiency
• Regulatory Efforts and the CSDR Settlement Discipline Regime
• Shorter Settlement Cycles and Market Evolution
• The Role of OTC Liquidity in Improving Settlement Efficiency
• Identifying and Managing Settlement Risks
• Challenges Across Different Markets and Jurisdictions
• Maintaining Market Stability
• The Value of Improved Settlement Performance
• Preparing for the Future

Understanding Settlement Efficiency

Settlement efficiency represents the ability of market participants to complete securities transactions accurately and on time. When a trade is executed, settlement instructions must flow seamlessly between counterparties, custodians, and clearing systems to ensure the exchange of securities and cash occurs as expected. Any breakdown in this settlement process can result in settlement fails, creating risks for both individual firms and the broader financial system.

The costs associated with settlement inefficiency extend beyond immediate financial penalties. Failed settlements tie up capital, increase operational complexity, and can damage client relationships. For this reason, improving settlement efficiency has become a priority for the industry, with various efforts underway to assess current performance and identify areas requiring more work.

Regulatory Efforts and the CSDR Settlement Discipline Regime

European markets have been at the forefront of settlement discipline through the introduction of the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR). The CSDR settlement discipline regime, which includes provisions for cash penalties on settlement fails, represents a significant regulatory intervention designed to improve efficiency across EU markets. These CSDR penalties are based on the value and duration of failed settlements, creating direct financial consequences for firms that fail to settle on time. The application of CSDR cash penalties has coincided with a definitive reduction in settlement fails.

The UK has similarly released guidelines for addressing settlement discipline, recognizing that the benefits of improved settlement extend to all market participants. Regulators in multiple jurisdictions have made settlement efficiency a central focus, moving beyond voluntary compliance toward mandatory frameworks that compel firms to reduce settlement fails.

The introduction of cash penalties under CSDR has fundamentally changed how market participants manage their settlement operations. Firms must now assess their settlement performance with greater rigor, identifying potential fail scenarios before they occur and preparing contingency plans to ensure that pending instructions or issues within settlement workflows are promptly addressed. This regulatory pressure, while initially difficult for some organizations to implement, has driven important improvements across the industry. Fail rates for equities have dropped since the implementation of the CSDR settlement discipline regime, but not as much as anticipated.

Shorter Settlement Cycles and Market Evolution

The global trend toward shorter settlement cycles represents another critical development. Moving from T+2 to T+1 settlement in equities markets reduces the time available for completing settlement instructions, thereby increasing the importance of operational efficiency. Each business day becomes more valuable when settlement windows compress, and the volume of transactions that must be processed within tighter timeframes continues to grow.

Fixed income markets present particular challenges in this context. Unlike equities, fixed income securities often involve more complex settlement arrangements, with varying settlement conventions across different instrument types and markets. The diversity of fixed income instruments, combined with their often-limited liquidity in secondary markets, makes settlement discipline especially challenging to achieve.

The Role of OTC Liquidity in Improving Settlement Efficiency

OTC liquidity serves as a crucial tool for firms seeking to improve settlement efficiency. When market participants face potential settlement fails due to securities shortfalls, access to OTC liquidity can provide the necessary instruments to fulfill settlement obligations. Rather than allowing a transaction to fail and incurring penalties, firms can source securities through OTC channels, completing the settlement as required.

This capability is particularly valuable in markets where securities availability may be constrained. For example, certain fixed income instruments trade infrequently, and sourcing them quickly through traditional exchange mechanisms may prove difficult. OTC markets, with their network of dealers and institutional participants, offer alternative channels for identifying and accessing the securities needed to settle trades.

The partnership between traditional settlement infrastructure and OTC liquidity providers has become increasingly important. Custodians and other intermediaries now maintain relationships with multiple liquidity sources, enabling them to quickly contact counterparties who may hold the securities required to complete a settlement. This network effect reduces fail rates by expanding the pool of available securities beyond what might be present in centralized markets.

Identifying and Managing Settlement Risks

To effectively improve settlement efficiency, firms must first assess their current performance and identify the primary sources of settlement fails. Data analysis plays a central role in this process, with organizations examining fail rates across different asset classes, counterparties, and settlement venues. A detailed report on settlement performance can reveal patterns that might otherwise remain hidden, such as recurring issues with specific securities or systematic problems with particular custodians.

Once risks are identified, firms can implement targeted efforts to address them. This might involve improving the quality of settlement instructions, enhancing communication with counterparties, or establishing backup arrangements for securities sourcing. The complexity of modern settlement systems means that even small improvements in operational details can yield significant benefits in terms of reduced fail rates.

Technology plays an increasingly important role in managing settlement risks. Automated systems can flag potential settlement issues before they occur, providing operations teams with the information needed to take corrective action. Real-time monitoring of settlement status enables firms to identify problems early in the business day, maximizing the time available to resolve them before settlement deadlines.

Challenges Across Different Markets and Jurisdictions

Settlement efficiency challenges vary significantly across different markets and jurisdictions. European markets operating under the CSDR settlement discipline regime face different pressures than those in other regions, though the trend toward harmonization is gradually reducing these disparities. Cross-border transactions introduce additional complexity, as settlement may involve multiple custodians, different settlement systems, and varying market conventions.

The increasing focus on settlement discipline has highlighted the need for better coordination among all participants in the settlement process. Firms, custodians, central securities depositories, and regulators must work together to create an environment where settlement efficiency can thrive. The industry continues to look for an environment that optimizes the facilitation of settlements to improve efficiency. A table comparing settlement efficiency metrics, such as settlement fail rates and benchmarks across different markets and regulatory regimes, can help identify areas for improvement and track progress. This requires not only technological improvements but also changes in market practices and business processes that have been in place for decades.

Maintaining Market Stability

Maintaining market stability remains a central topic for European markets, especially as the industry adapts to evolving settlement instructions and the demands of the settlement discipline regime. The introduction of the CSDR settlement discipline regime has been instrumental in driving improvements in settlement efficiency, with cash penalties for settlement fails serving as a powerful incentive for firms to enhance their settlement process. As a result, recent data released by regulators and market participants shows a notable reduction in fail rates across the EU, underscoring the effectiveness of these measures.

Market participants—including firms, custodians, and regulators—are increasingly working in partnership to improve settlement efficiency and reduce the frequency of settlement fails. This collaborative approach is particularly important as the industry moves toward shorter settlement cycles, such as T+1, which compress the time available to complete settlement instructions and increase the operational complexity, especially in fixed income markets. The transition to shorter cycles is expected to further improve efficiency, but it also introduces new challenges that require careful management and coordination.

A key focus for improving settlement efficiency is the adoption of standardized settlement instructions and the integration of advanced technology to minimize manual errors. By streamlining the settlement process and leveraging automation, market participants can better manage the risks associated with settlement fails and reduce the costs that arise from inefficiencies. The importance of settlement discipline is clear: it not only supports market stability but also helps firms control costs and maintain client confidence.

Despite the progress made, the complexity of European markets means that more work is needed to fully address the challenges of identifying and managing settlement fails. The partnership between regulators, market participants, and custodians is essential for navigating these complexities and ensuring that settlement discipline remains a priority. Policymakers in both the UK and EU continue to discuss the importance of improving settlement efficiency, recognizing that robust settlement processes are critical to the stability and integrity of financial markets.

Looking ahead, the adoption of new technologies—such as the Unique Transaction Identifier—promises to further enhance the ability of firms to track, manage, and complete settlement instructions efficiently. However, ongoing efforts are required to address the remaining challenges and ensure that the benefits of improved settlement efficiency are fully realized across all market segments.

Ultimately, maintaining market stability depends on a sustained focus on settlement efficiency, the reduction of settlement fails, and the effective management of settlement risks. By prioritizing these objectives and fostering strong partnerships across the industry, market participants can help ensure that European markets remain resilient, efficient, and attractive to investors.

The Value of Improved Settlement Performance

The benefits of improving settlement efficiency extend throughout the financial ecosystem. For clients, better settlement performance means reduced uncertainty and lower costs. Trades that settle as expected enable investors to deploy capital more effectively and manage their portfolios with greater confidence. The reduction in settlement fails also decreases systemic risks, as failed settlements can create chains of failures that propagate through connected transactions.

For the industry as a whole, improved settlement efficiency supports market integrity and investor confidence. Markets that consistently demonstrate high settlement rates attract more participants and transaction volume, creating a virtuous cycle of liquidity and efficiency. Conversely, markets plagued by high fail rates may see participants withdraw or demand higher returns to compensate for settlement risks.

Policymakers recognize these dynamics and have made settlement efficiency a priority in their efforts to strengthen financial markets. The adoption of settlement discipline regimes represents an acknowledgment that voluntary efforts alone were insufficient to achieve the necessary improvements, and that regulatory intervention was required to drive meaningful change.

Preparing for the Future

As the world of securities settlement continues to evolve, market participants must continue adopting new technologies and practices to maintain and improve efficiency. The introduction of distributed ledger technology, real-time settlement systems, and enhanced data standards all hold promise for reducing settlement complexity and improving performance. However, realizing these benefits requires sustained investment and coordination across the industry.

Firstly, firms must continue to assess their settlement operations and identify opportunities for improvement. This ongoing evaluation should consider both current performance and future challenges, such as further reductions in settlement cycles or expansion into new markets. Secondly, maintaining strong relationships with liquidity providers, including OTC market participants, ensures access to the securities needed to meet settlement obligations even in challenging market conditions.

Conclusion

Improving settlement efficiency with OTC liquidity is no longer just a regulatory or operational concern—it is a competitive differentiator. As settlement cycles shorten and compliance expectations intensify, firms need partners that can combine deep liquidity, predictable execution, and robust post-trade processes. This is where FinchTrade plays a critical role.

By providing institutional-grade OTC liquidity, efficient settlement infrastructure, and hands-on operational support, FinchTrade enables market participants to execute large transactions with confidence, minimize settlement risk, and maintain capital efficiency. Rather than treating settlement as a downstream afterthought, FinchTrade integrates liquidity, pricing, and settlement into a single, streamlined workflow. In an environment shaped by settlement discipline regimes and growing market complexity, working with a specialized OTC liquidity provider allows firms to focus on growth—while ensuring that settlement remains fast, reliable, and compliant.

For requesting more information about how we can help reach out to us. We're here to help and answer any questions you may have.

Contact us!