Home Products OTC liquidity Integrate Who we serve Payment providers OTC desks Banks & Neobanks Asset manager Crypto exchange Guide Quick start FAQs Knowledge hub Referrals About
In today’s ever evolving landscape of financial markets, Payment Service Providers (PSPs) face a critical decision when establishing their trading infrastructure: should they rely on a single liquidity provider or embrace liquidity aggregation from multiple sources? Liquidity aggregation enables access to aggregate liquidity, which refers to the combined liquidity from various markets and platforms, providing better trade execution, deeper market depth, and improved price stability. The rise of electronic trading has made liquidity aggregation more accessible and efficient for PSPs, allowing them to serve clients effectively, manage costs, and maintain competitive advantage in an increasingly complex financial market environment.
Liquidity refers to the ease with which assets can be bought or sold in the market without affecting their price.
Liquidity aggregation is the process of collecting liquidity from multiple liquidity providers to create a unified pool of tradeable assets. Rather than depending on a single source, a liquidity aggregator is a platform or system that pools liquidity from multiple sources to improve market conditions and execution. Liquidity aggregators gather streamed prices from various liquidity providers, including banks, financial institutions, electronic communication networks (ECNs), and other market participants. This approach allows PSPs to simultaneously obtain streamed prices from different liquidity providers, creating aggregated liquidity that offers enhanced market depth and improved trading conditions. Liquidity aggregators scan multiple sources to ensure orders are executed at the best price available, so traders benefit from access to best prices across different venues.
The liquidity aggregation process operates as a continuous process where technology companies and specialized platforms act as intermediaries, connecting PSPs with multiple liquidity sources. Clients connected to these systems act as both liquidity consumers and suppliers, contributing to the overall liquidity network. These aggregators use sophisticated algorithms and smart order routing to ensure optimal execution quality while maintaining high speed connectivity between market participants and liquidity pools. Market players such as banks, brokers, and institutional investors all participate in the aggregation process. As part of this process, significant funds passing through these systems support liquidity by moving capital between liquidity pools and trading platforms. Liquidity aggregation enables the handling of large volumes of trades efficiently, which is essential for stable and effective markets. Slippage occurs when there is a delay or insufficient liquidity, but aggregation helps reduce this risk. Aggregation creates optimal conditions for buying assets at favorable prices, and supports a stable trading process by minimizing volatility and ensuring continuous liquidity. Liquidity aggregation applies to any financial instrument, including stocks, currencies, and cryptocurrencies, and a trading instrument can be any asset that is bought and sold in the market. The speed and efficiency of order execution can depend on whether a specific asset is supported by multiple liquidity sources.
Liquidity aggregation is the process of collecting and combining buy and sell orders from multiple liquidity providers to form a single, unified liquidity pool. This approach allows market participants to benefit from a deeper and more stable pool of liquidity, which can significantly improve execution quality and reduce the risk of price volatility. By aggregating liquidity from multiple sources, liquidity aggregators enable traders to access better pricing and tighter spreads, making it easier to buy and sell assets at fair market prices.
The liquidity aggregation process relies on advanced technology and sophisticated algorithms that connect to various liquidity providers in real time. These systems continuously collect and analyze market data, ensuring that orders are executed at the best possible prices available across all connected sources. Aggregation is the process that brings together liquidity from different providers, allowing for more efficient trading and a smoother trading process overall. As a result, market participants can take advantage of increased market depth and improved pricing, regardless of market conditions.
Liquidity providers are essential players in the liquidity aggregation process, supplying the buy and sell orders that form the backbone of market liquidity. These entities can include banks, brokerages, hedge funds, and other financial institutions with substantial inventories of securities or currencies. In the foreign exchange market, major banks and investment firms often act as primary liquidity providers, ensuring that there is sufficient liquidity for traders to execute transactions quickly and at competitive market prices.
By consistently offering buy and sell orders, liquidity providers help maintain stable market conditions and facilitate efficient trading. Their participation ensures that market participants have access to the liquidity they need, reducing the likelihood of slippage and enabling smoother execution of trades. Ultimately, the presence of robust liquidity providers in the market supports fair pricing and helps create a more reliable trading environment for all participants.
Single-venue trading represents the traditional approach where PSPs establish relationships with one primary liquidity provider. This model typically involves direct access to a specific forex broker or financial institution that serves as the sole source for market prices and order execution. While simpler in structure, this approach limits PSPs to the trading volume, market access, and pricing available from that single provider. In this setup, traders may only have access to a single bid price for a given currency pair, which can limit their ability to obtain competitive rates.
Companies act as intermediaries in this model, but the relationship remains bilateral, with the PSP relying entirely on one entity for market liquidity. This can create dependencies that may impact the overall trading experience and limit flexibility in rapidly changing market conditions.
One of the most significant benefits of liquidity aggregation is increased market depth. By accessing multiple liquidity sources, including a wide range of market players, PSPs can offer their clients improved pricing and better execution, particularly for high liquidity currency pairs and popular trading instruments. Liquidity aggregation enables PSPs to efficiently process large volumes of trades, even during periods of high market activity. The aggregated liquidity approach ensures that even during periods of market volatility, sufficient liquidity remains available to maintain smooth operation.
Multiple liquidity providers and other market players contribute to increased liquidity, which is particularly valuable when dealing with low liquid assets or less common trading instruments. This diversity of liquidity sources helps prevent situations where a single provider’s limitations could impact the entire trading process.
Liquidity aggregation typically results in lower transaction costs for PSPs and their clients. By comparing prices from various liquidity providers in real-time, PSPs can identify the best available rates and execute trades at optimal prices. Liquidity aggregation allows PSPs to execute trades at the best price available across all connected sources, ensuring clients benefit from access to best prices for their transactions. This competitive environment among liquidity providers naturally leads to tighter spreads, benefiting both PSPs and their end customers.
The ability to access multiple markets simultaneously also provides PSPs with valuable insights into market conditions and pricing trends, enabling them to make more informed decisions about their trading strategies and risk management approaches.
Diversifying across multiple liquidity sources significantly reduces counterparty risk. In single-venue trading, PSPs face concentration risk - if their sole liquidity provider experiences technical issues, liquidity shortages, or other operational problems, the PSP's entire operation could be affected. Liquidity aggregation distributes this risk across several providers, ensuring business continuity even if one source becomes unavailable.
Modern liquidity aggregators employ sophisticated algorithmic trading systems and smart order routing technology to optimize trade execution. These systems analyze market conditions across multiple venues in real-time, automatically routing orders to the source offering the best combination of price, speed, and available liquidity. This technological advantage is particularly beneficial in the fast-paced forex market and cryptocurrency market, where milliseconds can impact profitability.
Implementing liquidity aggregation requires significant investment capital and technical expertise. International companies and large financial institutions are typically best positioned to manage the technical and financial demands of liquidity aggregation. PSPs must invest in robust technology infrastructure capable of handling connections to multiple liquidity providers while maintaining high speed connectivity and reliable performance. Robust infrastructure is essential to securely manage the large volumes of funds passing through these systems. The initial setup costs and ongoing maintenance of such systems can be substantial, particularly for smaller PSPs.
Managing relationships with multiple liquidity providers adds operational complexity. Each provider may have different technical specifications, settlement procedures, and commercial terms. This complexity requires dedicated resources and expertise to ensure all connections function optimally and that the aggregation process remains stable.
While modern systems are highly efficient, connecting to multiple sources can potentially introduce latency compared to direct connections to single venues. However, advances in technology and strategic placement of servers have largely mitigated this concern for most use cases.
Single-venue trading offers simplicity and potentially lower initial costs. PSPs can establish deep relationships with their chosen provider, often receiving preferential treatment, dedicated support, and customized solutions. Single-venue providers may offer transparent fee structures; however, there is also the possible retention of certain commissions or profits during transactions. The streamlined integration process requires fewer technical resources and can be implemented more quickly than complex aggregation systems.
For PSPs with specific requirements or those serving niche markets, a carefully selected single provider might offer specialized services or particular expertise that broader aggregation platforms cannot match. Single-venue trading can be especially advantageous for PSPs focused on one currency or a limited set of assets.
The primary drawback of single-venue trading is limited market access and reduced competitiveness. PSPs are constrained by their provider’s liquidity, pricing, and available trading instruments. If the provider’s spreads are not competitive or if they experience capacity constraints during high trading volume periods, the PSP’s clients may suffer from suboptimal execution quality. Slippage occurs more frequently in these situations, especially when relying on a single provider during periods of low liquidity or high trading volume.
Additionally, the lack of price comparison means PSPs cannot guarantee they’re offering the best available rates to their clients, potentially impacting client satisfaction and retention in competitive markets.
In the foreign exchange market, also known as the FX market, liquidity aggregation has become increasingly standard among competitive PSPs. The FX market’s 24-hour nature and the variety of currency pairs available make access to multiple liquidity sources particularly valuable, as trading in the FX market revolves around currency pairs. Different liquidity providers may specialize in specific regional markets or currency pairs, making aggregation essential for comprehensive market coverage.
In the context of price discovery, the bid price represents the highest price a buyer is willing to pay for one currency in a currency pair. Liquidity aggregation helps ensure optimal conditions for buying assets in the FX market by consolidating offers, reducing spreads, and improving trade execution.
The cryptocurrency market presents unique challenges due to its fragmented nature and varying liquidity across different exchanges and trading instruments. The availability of liquidity for a specific asset can vary greatly between platforms, making aggregation essential to ensure efficient order execution. Liquidity aggregation is often essential for PSPs operating in this space, as no single venue provides sufficient market depth for all digital assets.
For more traditional financial instruments and established markets, single-venue trading may remain viable, particularly for PSPs with specific client bases or limited trading requirements. However, even in these markets, the benefits of price comparison and risk diversification make aggregation increasingly attractive.
The liquidity aggregation process operates within a framework of regulatory requirements that vary by market and jurisdiction. In the foreign exchange market, for example, liquidity aggregators must adhere to regulations such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the United States and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) in the European Union. These rules require liquidity aggregators to register with relevant authorities, maintain transparent trading practices, and meet stringent risk management and capital standards.
Additionally, liquidity aggregators are obligated to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations, which involve verifying client identities and monitoring trading activity for suspicious behavior. By following these regulatory guidelines, liquidity aggregators help ensure that their operations are transparent, secure, and fair, providing a safe and stable trading environment for their clients and contributing to the overall integrity of the market.
The decision between liquidity aggregation and single-venue trading depends on several factors:
Business Scale and Ambitions: Larger PSPs handling significant trading volume typically benefit more from liquidity aggregation, while smaller operations might find single-venue trading more manageable initially.
Client Requirements: PSPs serving sophisticated clients or operating in competitive markets generally need the advantages that liquidity aggregation provides, including better pricing and deeper markets.
Technical Capabilities: Organizations with strong technical teams and adequate investment capital are better positioned to implement and maintain aggregation systems effectively.
Risk Appetite: PSPs concerned about operational risk and business continuity typically prefer the diversification that multiple liquidity sources provide.
Market Focus: PSPs operating across multiple markets or offering diverse trading instruments generally benefit from aggregation, while those with narrow focus might succeed with specialized single providers.
The financial services industry continues evolving toward greater automation, improved efficiency, and enhanced client experience. Liquidity aggregation represents the direction of this evolution, offering PSPs the tools to compete effectively in an increasingly sophisticated marketplace.
For most PSPs, particularly those with growth ambitions, implementing liquidity aggregation provides significant long-term advantages despite higher initial complexity and costs. The improved pricing, reduced risk, and enhanced competitiveness typically justify the investment.
However, PSPs should approach this decision strategically, considering their current capabilities, client needs, and long-term business objectives. Some may benefit from a phased approach, starting with single-venue trading and gradually implementing aggregation as their business grows and technical capabilities develop.
While both liquidity aggregation and single-venue trading have their merits, the evolving landscape of financial markets increasingly favors aggregation for PSPs seeking to remain competitive. For companies like FinchTrade, the benefits of improved pricing, enhanced risk management, and broader market access outweigh the added complexity and costs.
PSPs must carefully assess their needs, but those that implement liquidity aggregation effectively—like FinchTrade—will be better equipped to provide superior service to clients, manage risks, and seize opportunities in a dynamic financial ecosystem. The key is selecting the strategy that best supports both immediate needs and future growth.
For requesting more information about how we can help reach out to us. We're here to help and answer any questions you may have.
A single gateway to liquidity with competitive prices, fast settlements, and lightning-fast issue resolution
Get started
For more information, demo request or any conversation about the product and our work conditions:
Our services are not available to retail clients residing in, or corporate clients registered or established in, the United Kingdom, the United States, the European Union, or other restricted jurisdictions. Access to this website does not constitute an offer or solicitation to provide services in these jurisdictions.
The obtained data is processed in accordance with our Privacy policy
Thank you for your interest in FinchTrade!
We will contact you soon
An error has occurred. Please try again later or contact customer support for assistance.
Our services are not available to retail clients residing in, or corporate clients registered or established in, the United Kingdom, the United States, the European Union, or other restricted jurisdictions. Access to this website does not constitute an offer or solicitation to provide services in these jurisdictions.
The obtained data is processed in accordance with our Privacy policy
Our services are not available to retail clients residing in, or corporate clients registered or established in, the United Kingdom, the United States, the European Union, or other restricted jurisdictions. The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a public offer, financial or investment advice, or marketing communication. FinchTrade group is not MiCAR compliant, nor FCA regulated, and nothing on this website should be construed as an offer to provide regulated services or financial instruments. Visitors are encouraged to seek independent legal, financial, or professional advice before making any decisions based on the information presented. FinchTrade group assumes no liability for any actions taken in reliance on the content of this website.